The Negative Outlooks reflect the significant falls in global credit and equity markets, and unprecedented market volatility and uncertainty. Of greatest concern to Fitch are declines in the market value of investment holdings that have led to significant declines in economic capitalisation and profitability for many insurers. Ongoing market volatility means there is potential for significant further reductions in capital as market values further decline, and additional impairments are recognized. Declines in investment performance are impacting essentially all insurers, to varying degrees.
The Negative Outlooks also reflect the much-reduced financial flexibility that many insurers, and financial institutions generally, have experienced under current capital market conditions. Limited capital markets access can be especially problematic if an insurer finds itself in a position of needing to raise capital to offset investment losses, but can not.
Finally, Fitch is concerned by the greater potential for liquidity strains for some insurance companies. Potential liquidity pressures are generally less severe for insurance companies than they are for other types of financial institutions. Nonetheless, Fitch believes liquidity could become pressured for some life insurance companies, as well as some reinsurance companies, especially if they experience declines in their credit profiles that lead to erosions in market confidence.
The Negative Outlooks imply that over the next 12 to 24 months, Fitch expects more downgrades than upgrades within each of the sectors. However, it does not imply that all, or even a majority, of ratings within each sector will necessarily be downgraded. The Negative Outlook applies equally to Fitch's Insurer Financial Strength and fixed income security ratings of insurers.
Fitch believes that the prospective downward rating pressures are most significant for the life insurance sectors, and in particular for the U.S. life sector. In addition to the above noted general pressures, Fitch believes life insurer exposures to variable annuity and unit-linked-type products, which offer guarantees typically linked to equity performance, further expose the sector to market risks and capital volatility. Further, and while varying greatly from company to company, some life insurers have material liquidity exposures tied to businesses dependent on institutional funding, securities lending activities, products with ratings triggers, and within products such as deferred annuities, in which deposits can be withdrawn at the discretion of the policyholder (albeit typically with a surrender penalty).
Despite the above-mentioned pressures, Fitch believes that a number of life insurers are relatively well-positioned to cope with an environment of capital markets volatility and market illiquidity. Prior to the current challenges, many life insurers had built up significant capital buffers, following a period of favourable investment market conditions.
For the non-life insurance sectors, declines in investment values and capital have exacerbated other pressures that the sectors were already facing, including ongoing intense competition and 'soft' premium rates in many lines of business, together with the expected general deterioration of underwriting results and expected reductions in reserve releases as compared to recent years. While capital pressures could ease the softening trend in non-life pricing, Fitch believes it would be premature to predict a shift to a hardening market.
Unlike life insurance companies, non-life insurers generally have minimal liquidity exposures as their products are not deposit-based or linked to institutional funding. However, Fitch believes that the Global Reinsurance sector could experience some liquidity pressure in the current environment. In many cases, reinsurers use bank letter of credit facilities to provide security for ceding companies. It is not uncommon for such facilities to contain ratings triggers that require the reinsurer to post cash collateral if their financial strength ratings fall below a defined level (typically below 'A-'). In addition, some reinsurance contracts contain cancellation or recapture provisions also tied to ratings triggers that could cause the reinsurer to fund the return of a portion of premiums to the ceding company in unwinding a contract.
Fitch notes that in the light of recent market pressures, governments in many countries have taken extraordinary measures to support their banking systems, including the provision of debt guarantees, extensions of deposit insurance and guarantees, capital investments, and in the U.S., the creation of a US$700 billion fund to purchase troubled assets. While these programs have been primarily focused on stabilising the global banking system, Fitch believes that should problems grow more significant and become widespread in the insurance industry, it is highly possible support offered via these programs will be extended to the insurance industry. This could temper downward ratings actions for these insurance companies.