The impact on workers varies widely across the OECD. Several countries moved towards greater targeting of benefits on poorer pensioners, notably Mexico, Portugal and the United Kingdom. Austria,
France, Germany and Sweden also protected low earners.
Reforms have worked in the opposite direction in other countries. Poland and the Slovak Republic, for example, have tightened the link between pension entitlements and earnings when working, without putting in place any new social safety nets for low earners. This may increase the poverty risk for retirees who have not been covered by the system over their full career, the report finds.
The most common feature of the reform packages is a change in pension age. When reforms are complete, most OECD countries will have a standard retirement age of 65 years, although in Denmark, Germany, Iceland, Norway, the United Kingdom and the United States, the pension age is or will be 67. Only France, Hungary and the Czech and Slovak Republic plan to have pension ages below 65.
But although pensions reforms in the OECD as a whole were substantial and necessary to ensure the financial sustainability of pensions systems for current and future retirees, more remains to be done.
Some countries, for example, are phasing in pension reforms too slowly, notably Austria, Italy, Mexico and Turkey. In Turkey, for example, the new retirement age of 65 will only be reached in 2043 for men and even later for women. This will mean spending on pensions will remain high for many decades and these financial pressures might require short-term adjustments that may cause more hardship than faster reforms would have done.
Early retirement is also still a problem in many countries, adding extra pressure to public finances. Between 1999 and 2004, for example, the average retirement age for men was below 60 in eight OECD countries, including Belgium, France, Hungary and Italy.